↓ Skip to main content

Low–medium resolution HLA-DQ2/DQ8 typing for coeliac disease predisposition analysis by colorimetric assay

Overview of attention for article published in Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Low–medium resolution HLA-DQ2/DQ8 typing for coeliac disease predisposition analysis by colorimetric assay
Published in
Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, March 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00216-012-5898-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hamdi Joda, Valerio Beni, Deirdre Curnane, Ioanis Katakis, Noora Alakulppi, Jukka Partanen, Kristina Lind, Linda Strömbom, Ciara K. O’Sullivan

Abstract

Coeliac disease is an inflammation of the small intestine, occurring in genetically susceptible individuals triggered by the ingestion of gluten. Human Leukocyte Antigens (HLA) DQ2 and DQ8 gene have been identified as key genetic factors in coeliac disease as they are presented in almost 100 % of the patients. These genes are encoded by the combination of certain alleles in the DQA and DQB region of chromosome 6. Specifically, DQA1*05:01 and DQB1*02:01 alleles for serologically defined leukocyte antigen DQ2 cis, DQA1*05:05 and DQB1*02:02 for DQ2 trans and DQA1*03:01 and DQB1*03:02 alleles for the DQ8. Specific identification of these alleles is a challenge due to the high number of alleles that have been identified so far: 46 in the DQA region and 160 in the DQB region (as of IMGT/HLA Database 10/2011 release). In the reported work, the development of a multiplex colorimetric assay for the low to medium HLA typing of the DQ2 and DQ8 genes is presented. The optimisation of probe design and assay conditions, performed by both surface plasmon resonance and enzyme-linked oligonucleotide assay, are reported. Finally, the performances of the developed typing platform were validated by the analysis of real patient samples and HLA typing, compared with those obtained using hospital based typing technology and an excellent correlation obtained.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 4%
Russia 1 4%
Unknown 25 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 37%
Other 3 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 11%
Professor 2 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 6 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 4%
Other 6 22%
Unknown 6 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2012.
All research outputs
#20,674,485
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#6,612
of 9,624 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,779
of 170,572 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#85
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,624 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,572 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.