You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Review of the Development and Application of Generic Preference-Based Instruments with the Older Population
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s40258-019-00512-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jenny Cleland, Claire Hutchinson, Jyoti Khadka, Rachel Milte, Julie Ratcliffe |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| New Zealand | 3 | 33% |
| Australia | 2 | 22% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 78% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
| Scientists | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 69 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 17% |
| Unknown | 26 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 16% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 7% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 28 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2019.
All research outputs
#4,787,352
of 23,163,378 outputs
Outputs from Applied Health Economics and Health Policy
#209
of 788 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,759
of 340,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Health Economics and Health Policy
#7
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,163,378 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 788 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,823 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.