↓ Skip to main content

Impact of Number of Drug Types on Clinical Outcome in Patients with Acute Hip Fracture

Overview of attention for article published in The journal of nutrition, health & aging, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impact of Number of Drug Types on Clinical Outcome in Patients with Acute Hip Fracture
Published in
The journal of nutrition, health & aging, December 2019
DOI 10.1007/s12603-019-1250-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hiroki Maki, H. Wakabayashi, M. Nakamichi, R. Momosaki

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 15%
Researcher 2 15%
Student > Postgraduate 2 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 3 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 15%
Computer Science 1 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2023.
All research outputs
#6,352,045
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from The journal of nutrition, health & aging
#748
of 2,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,754
of 480,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The journal of nutrition, health & aging
#26
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,003 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 480,298 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.