You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Taming a Wicked Problem: Resolving Controversies in Biodiversity Offsetting
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BioScience, April 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1093/biosci/biw038 |
| Authors |
Martine Maron, Christopher D. Ives, Heini Kujala, Joseph W. Bull, Fleur J. F. Maseyk, Sarah Bekessy, Ascelin Gordon, James E.M. Watson, Pia E. Lentini, Philip Gibbons, Hugh P. Possingham, Richard J. Hobbs, David A. Keith, Brendan A. Wintle, Megan C. Evans |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 16 | 36% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 9% |
| United States | 3 | 7% |
| Sweden | 1 | 2% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 2% |
| Finland | 1 | 2% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 12 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 32 | 73% |
| Scientists | 11 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 314 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 4 | 1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 305 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 54 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 13% |
| Researcher | 40 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 35 | 11% |
| Other | 23 | 7% |
| Other | 41 | 13% |
| Unknown | 80 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 110 | 35% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 56 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 17 | 5% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 10 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 26 | 8% |
| Unknown | 89 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 72. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2023.
All research outputs
#603,787
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from BioScience
#238
of 2,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,955
of 317,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioScience
#7
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,636 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 41.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,786 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.