You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in a Contemporary Cohort of Women with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS)
|
---|---|
Published in |
Annals of Surgical Oncology, June 2019
|
DOI | 10.1245/s10434-019-07562-x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Farbod Darvishian, Ugur Ozerdem, Sylvia Adams, Jennifer Chun, Elizabeth Pirraglia, Elianna Kaplowitz, Amber Guth, Deborah Axelrod, Richard Shapiro, Alison Price, Andrea Troxel, Freya Schnabel, Daniel Roses |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 27% |
Mexico | 1 | 9% |
Sweden | 1 | 9% |
Peru | 1 | 9% |
Pakistan | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 4 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 55% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 27% |
Scientists | 1 | 9% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 14% |
Other | 4 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 11% |
Researcher | 4 | 11% |
Student > Master | 2 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Unknown | 15 | 42% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 47% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 6% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 15 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2019.
All research outputs
#5,587,401
of 23,164,913 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#1,775
of 6,570 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,557
of 350,970 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#68
of 133 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,164,913 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,570 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,970 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 133 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.