↓ Skip to main content

Pre‐surgical Administration of Microbial Cell Preparation in Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Surgery, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pre‐surgical Administration of Microbial Cell Preparation in Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Published in
World Journal of Surgery, April 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00268-016-3499-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chun Khui Tan, Suraya Said, Retnagowri Rajandram, Zhiqiang Wang, April Camilla Roslani, Kin Fah Chin

Abstract

Disruption of normal gut function is a common side effect post abdominal surgery. It may result in reduced tolerance to oral nutrition and progress to postoperative ileus. Microbial cell preparation is beneficial as a pre-surgical nutritional supplement to aid in bowel recovery and promote the return of normal gut function following abdominal surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of pre-surgical administration of microbial cell preparation in promoting the return of normal gut function. The study is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. In total, 40 patients were recruited. Patients were randomized to receive either microbial cell preparation (n = 20) or placebo (n = 20) for 7 days prior to elective surgery. The primary end point was the time to return of normal gut function, while the secondary end point was the duration of hospital stay. The treatment group demonstrated significantly faster return of normal gut function with a median of 108.5 h (80-250 h) which was 48 h earlier than the placebo group at a median of 156.5 h (94-220 h), p = 0.022. The duration of hospital stay in the treatment group was also shorter at a median of 6.5 days (4-30 days), in comparison to the placebo group at 13 days (5-25 days), p = 0.012. Pre-surgical administration of microbial cell preparation promotes the return of normal gut function in patients after colorectal cancer surgery, thus associated with faster recovery and shorter duration of hospital stay.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 83 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 15%
Student > Master 11 13%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Other 4 5%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 26 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 29 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2018.
All research outputs
#17,335,712
of 25,440,205 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgery
#3,291
of 4,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,282
of 313,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgery
#46
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,440,205 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,579 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,563 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.