You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Counting citations in the field of business and management: why use Google Scholar rather than the Web of Science
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientometrics, April 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11192-012-0729-2 |
| Authors |
Nabil Amara, Réjean Landry |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 50% |
| Brazil | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 6 | 5% |
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Unknown | 101 | 82% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 15% |
| Researcher | 17 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 11% |
| Librarian | 12 | 10% |
| Professor | 12 | 10% |
| Other | 40 | 33% |
| Unknown | 10 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 30 | 24% |
| Computer Science | 27 | 22% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 23 | 19% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 11 | 9% |
| Psychology | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 15 | 12% |
| Unknown | 13 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2012.
All research outputs
#16,291,909
of 24,973,800 outputs
Outputs from Scientometrics
#2,052
of 2,864 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,969
of 166,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientometrics
#18
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,973,800 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,864 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,075 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.