You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Fostering personalized learning in science inquiry supported by mobile technologies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Educational technology research and development, April 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11423-012-9245-6 |
| Authors |
Yanjie Song, Lung-Hsiang Wong, Chee-Kit Looi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 265 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 2% |
| Malaysia | 2 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Bulgaria | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Sri Lanka | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 248 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 58 | 22% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 44 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 29 | 11% |
| Lecturer | 18 | 7% |
| Researcher | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 60 | 23% |
| Unknown | 41 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 108 | 41% |
| Computer Science | 32 | 12% |
| Psychology | 13 | 5% |
| Arts and Humanities | 10 | 4% |
| Linguistics | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 38 | 14% |
| Unknown | 58 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2012.
All research outputs
#15,915,226
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Educational technology research and development
#594
of 1,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,959
of 176,482 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Educational technology research and development
#6
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,150 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,482 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.