↓ Skip to main content

moBeat: Using Interactive Music to Guide and Motivate Users During Aerobic Exercising

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Readers on

mendeley
123 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
moBeat: Using Interactive Music to Guide and Motivate Users During Aerobic Exercising
Published in
Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, March 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10484-011-9149-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bram van der Vlist, Christoph Bartneck, Sebastian Mäueler

Abstract

An increasing number of people are having trouble staying fit and maintaining a healthy bodyweight because of lack of physical activity. Getting people to exercise is crucial. However, many struggle with developing healthy exercising habits, due to hurdles like having to leave the house and the boring character of endurance exercising. In this paper, we report on a design project that explores the use of audio to motivate and provide feedback and guidance during exercising in a home environment. We developed moBeat, a system that provides intensity-based coaching while exercising, giving real-time feedback on training pace and intensity by means of interactive music. We conducted a within-subject comparison between our moBeat system and a commercially available heart rate watch. With moBeat, we achieved a comparable success rate: our system has a significant, positive influence on intrinsic motivation and attentional focus, but we did not see significant differences with regard to either perceived exertion or effectiveness. Although promising, future research is needed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Canada 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 117 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 14%
Student > Bachelor 15 12%
Researcher 12 10%
Professor 7 6%
Other 28 23%
Unknown 24 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 24 20%
Psychology 20 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 7%
Computer Science 8 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 7%
Other 26 21%
Unknown 28 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2016.
All research outputs
#14,081,606
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback
#216
of 355 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,405
of 111,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 355 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,014 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.