You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
An Update of Public Perceptions of Synthetic Biology: Still Undecided?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
NanoEthics, April 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11569-016-0256-3 |
| Authors |
Mirko Ancillotti, Virgil Rerimassie, Stefanie B. Seitz, Walburg Steurer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 1 | 33% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 77 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 16 | 21% |
| Unknown | 15 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 15 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 9% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 17% |
| Unknown | 21 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2019.
All research outputs
#15,022,226
of 24,292,134 outputs
Outputs from NanoEthics
#139
of 254 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,593
of 303,585 outputs
Outputs of similar age from NanoEthics
#5
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,292,134 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 254 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 303,585 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.