You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Concise review of genus Chondracanthus (Rhodophyta: Gigartinales)
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Applied Phycology, November 2019
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10811-019-01956-w |
Authors |
Cristian Bulboa Contador, Ignacio Pérez Massad, Loretto Contreras-Porcia, Javier Zapata, Francisco Castañeda, María Eliana Ramírez, Patricia Gil-Kodaka |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 47 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 14 | 30% |
Professor | 5 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 6% |
Student > Master | 2 | 4% |
Other | 4 | 9% |
Unknown | 15 | 32% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 32% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 6% |
Chemical Engineering | 2 | 4% |
Environmental Science | 2 | 4% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 4% |
Other | 5 | 11% |
Unknown | 18 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2020.
All research outputs
#12,822,197
of 23,172,045 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Phycology
#797
of 2,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,940
of 366,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Phycology
#7
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,172,045 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,566 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,085 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.