↓ Skip to main content

Is Incarceration a Contributor to Health Disparities? Access to Care of Formerly Incarcerated Adults

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Community Health, February 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Readers on

mendeley
148 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Is Incarceration a Contributor to Health Disparities? Access to Care of Formerly Incarcerated Adults
Published in
Journal of Community Health, February 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10900-010-9234-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sonali P. Kulkarni, Susie Baldwin, Amy S. Lightstone, Lillian Gelberg, Allison L. Diamant

Abstract

Despite the disproportionate prevalence of incarceration in communities of color, few studies have examined its contribution to health disparities. We examined whether a lifetime history of incarceration is associated with recent access to medical and dental care. We performed a secondary data analysis of the 2007 Los Angeles County Health Survey, a population-based random-digit-dialing telephone survey of county households. Any history of incarceration in a prison/jail/detention center as an adult was assessed for a random subsample. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses examined whether incarceration history was associated with access to care, controlling for other characteristics. Ten percent of our study population reported a history of incarceration. While persons with an incarceration history were similar to their peers with regard to health and insurance status, their access to medical and dental care was worse. Incarceration history was independently associated with disparities in access to care. Interventions to improve the health of communities affected by high rates of incarceration could include efforts that enable access to care for formerly incarcerated adults.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Uganda 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 143 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 24 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 16%
Student > Master 22 15%
Researcher 17 11%
Student > Bachelor 15 10%
Other 26 18%
Unknown 21 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 37 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 35 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 9%
Psychology 11 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Other 13 9%
Unknown 33 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2015.
All research outputs
#6,329,568
of 22,664,267 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Community Health
#368
of 1,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,292
of 164,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Community Health
#5
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,664,267 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,210 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,950 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.