↓ Skip to main content

Dynamic Interactions between Large-Scale Brain Networks Predict Behavioral Adaptation after Perceptual Errors

Overview of attention for article published in Cerebral Cortex, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
143 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
275 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dynamic Interactions between Large-Scale Brain Networks Predict Behavioral Adaptation after Perceptual Errors
Published in
Cerebral Cortex, April 2012
DOI 10.1093/cercor/bhs069
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael X Cohen, Simon van Gaal

Abstract

Failures to perceive visual stimuli lead to errors in decision making. Different theoretical accounts implicate either medial frontal (MF) cognitive control processes or prestimulus occipital (OC) cortical oscillatory dynamics in errors during perceptual tasks. Here, we show that these 2 previously unconnected theoretical accounts can be reconciled, and the brain regions described by the 2 theories have complimentary and interactive roles in supporting error adaptation. Using a perceptual discrimination task and time-frequency network-based analyses of electroencephalography data, we show that perceptual anticipation and posterror top-down control mechanisms recruit distinct but interacting brain networks. MF sites were a hub for theta-band networks and theta-alpha coupling elicited after errors, whereas occipital sites were a network hub during stimulus anticipation and alpha-gamma coupling. Granger causality analyses revealed that these networks communicate in their preferred direction and frequency band: response-related MF → OC interactions occurred in the theta band, whereas stimulus anticipation-related OC → MF interactions occurred in the alpha band. Subjects with stronger network interactions were more likely to improve performance after errors. These findings demonstrate that multiple large-scale brain networks interact dynamically and in a directionally specific manner in different frequency bands to support flexible behavior adaptation during perceptual decision making.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 275 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 4 1%
United States 4 1%
Switzerland 3 1%
Brazil 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Russia 2 <1%
Iceland 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 254 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 70 25%
Researcher 64 23%
Student > Master 34 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 6%
Student > Bachelor 16 6%
Other 50 18%
Unknown 24 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 110 40%
Neuroscience 53 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 8%
Engineering 15 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 3%
Other 22 8%
Unknown 45 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2014.
All research outputs
#7,149,102
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Cerebral Cortex
#2,173
of 5,193 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,757
of 174,270 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cerebral Cortex
#36
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,193 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,270 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.