↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of Compendial Antimicrobial Effectiveness Tests: A Review

Overview of attention for article published in AAPS PharmSciTech, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
11 patents

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of Compendial Antimicrobial Effectiveness Tests: A Review
Published in
AAPS PharmSciTech, January 2011
DOI 10.1208/s12249-010-9575-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cheryl L. Moser, Brian K. Meyer

Abstract

The antimicrobial effectiveness or preservative effectiveness test is described in the tripartite compendia for sterile parenteral multi-dose formulated products. The execution of the test is essentially harmonized with respect to inoculum preparation and test execution but not the acceptance criteria. This article describes how a single test can be performed that procedurally satisfies all of the compendia and their acceptance criteria.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 82 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 19%
Researcher 12 14%
Student > Bachelor 10 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 7%
Other 5 6%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 23 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 19 23%
Chemistry 8 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 6%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 25 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2023.
All research outputs
#2,989,593
of 23,103,436 outputs
Outputs from AAPS PharmSciTech
#68
of 1,480 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,346
of 182,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AAPS PharmSciTech
#2
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,103,436 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,480 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,220 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.