You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluating the implementation of a personal health record for chronic primary and secondary care: a mixed methods approach
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12911-019-0969-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Floor Sieverink, Saskia Kelders, Annemarie Braakman-Jansen, Julia van Gemert-Pijnen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sri Lanka | 1 | 33% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 133 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 22 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 16% |
| Researcher | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 16 | 12% |
| Unknown | 42 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 17% |
| Unspecified | 22 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 6 | 5% |
| Psychology | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 20 | 15% |
| Unknown | 47 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2020.
All research outputs
#12,848,444
of 23,177,498 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#850
of 2,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,877
of 459,247 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#30
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,177,498 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,016 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 459,247 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.