↓ Skip to main content

Comparative therapeutic efficacy of remdesivir and combination lopinavir, ritonavir, and interferon beta against MERS-CoV

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
1689 Mendeley
Title
Comparative therapeutic efficacy of remdesivir and combination lopinavir, ritonavir, and interferon beta against MERS-CoV
Published in
Nature Communications, January 2020
DOI 10.1038/s41467-019-13940-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Timothy P. Sheahan, Amy C. Sims, Sarah R. Leist, Alexandra Schäfer, John Won, Ariane J. Brown, Stephanie A. Montgomery, Alison Hogg, Darius Babusis, Michael O. Clarke, Jamie E. Spahn, Laura Bauer, Scott Sellers, Danielle Porter, Joy Y. Feng, Tomas Cihlar, Robert Jordan, Mark R. Denison, Ralph S. Baric

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 348 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,689 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1689 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 214 13%
Student > Bachelor 193 11%
Student > Master 185 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 151 9%
Other 94 6%
Other 338 20%
Unknown 514 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 303 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 203 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 130 8%
Chemistry 77 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 74 4%
Other 313 19%
Unknown 589 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1003. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2024.
All research outputs
#16,434
of 25,813,008 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#324
of 58,562 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#410
of 480,325 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#8
of 1,447 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,813,008 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 58,562 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 480,325 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,447 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.