You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Tuning the threshold voltage in electrolyte-gated organic field-effect transistors
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, May 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.1120311109 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Loïg Kergoat, Lars Herlogsson, Benoit Piro, Minh Chau Pham, Gilles Horowitz, Xavier Crispin, Magnus Berggren |
| Abstract |
Low-voltage organic field-effect transistors (OFETs) promise for low power consumption logic circuits. To enhance the efficiency of the logic circuits, the control of the threshold voltage of the transistors are based on is crucial. We report the systematic control of the threshold voltage of electrolyte-gated OFETs by using various gate metals. The influence of the work function of the metal is investigated in metal-electrolyte-organic semiconductor diodes and electrolyte-gated OFETs. A good correlation is found between the flat-band potential and the threshold voltage. The possibility to tune the threshold voltage over half the potential range applied and to obtain depletion-like (positive threshold voltage) and enhancement (negative threshold voltage) transistors is of great interest when integrating these transistors in logic circuits. The combination of a depletion-like and enhancement transistor leads to a clear improvement of the noise margins in depleted-load unipolar inverters. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 177 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 171 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 51 | 29% |
| Researcher | 36 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 31 | 18% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 7% |
| Professor | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 21 | 12% |
| Unknown | 17 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Materials Science | 51 | 29% |
| Engineering | 29 | 16% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 28 | 16% |
| Chemistry | 28 | 16% |
| Chemical Engineering | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 5% |
| Unknown | 27 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,924,970
of 24,625,114 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#24,006
of 101,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,376
of 167,694 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#215
of 943 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,625,114 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 101,438 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,694 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 943 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.