You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Do mobile device apps designed to support medication adherence demonstrate efficacy? A systematic review of randomised controlled trials, with meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMJ Open, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032045 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Laura Catherine Armitage, Aikaterini Kassavou, Stephen Sutton |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 18% |
| United States | 3 | 8% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 3% |
| Grenada | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Belgium | 1 | 3% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 18 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 28 | 72% |
| Scientists | 4 | 10% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 271 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 271 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 41 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 13% |
| Researcher | 29 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 8% |
| Other | 11 | 4% |
| Other | 32 | 12% |
| Unknown | 101 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 39 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 29 | 11% |
| Psychology | 17 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 13 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 12 | 4% |
| Other | 48 | 18% |
| Unknown | 113 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,297,589
of 25,827,956 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#2,330
of 25,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,100
of 478,247 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#50
of 561 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,827,956 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,972 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 478,247 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 561 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.