@skane2600 @stevendeknight My bad. You are correct. https://t.co/C8ViXBnKf1
@dubbyruntle N95 obviously best, as I think most people know these days. But anything better than nothing if that’s all people have. https://t.co/dPb43CYMIS
RT @RadCentrism: Physics gonna physics. https://t.co/dPb43CYMIS
RT @RadCentrism: Physics gonna physics. https://t.co/dPb43CYMIS
Physics gonna physics. https://t.co/dPb43CYMIS
@RobProvince I know you likely failed non-calc physics, but I believe in you. Have GPT explain it to you. https://t.co/dPb43CYMIS
RT @Emily_Burns_V: 7/ This is why N-95’s are fit-tested, b/c they offer virtually NO protection with even a 1% gap—as noted in this paper…
@AdvocatingMomma https://t.co/MnjjvrjWPS def don’t recommend most make😷b/c skill level is🇮🇹master tailor level lol I’m actually a fast sewer even! Washed cotton canvas & poly chiffon instead of interfacing & baste 5 layers & lining separate… b
@MarkChangizi @Anarcho_Cyclist @Loulabelly @brownecfm You sure you’re a scientist??? https://t.co/zW0VZNrVuL
@lairy_poppins @brownecfm @ibrake4ants Science says otherwise
@stkirsch @gorskon Aerosols are also significantly reduced by masks. Is it possible for you to refrain from baselessly claiming any and every death is caused by a vaccine for 24 hours? https://t.co/okFuRYGBZo
@ABridgen "Scientifically discredited"? No chap, they're not. https://t.co/cyYD5ORswx https://t.co/YaLpvUlqfi https://t.co/FZHVCCaVvT https://t.co/wOwaiQn9Yz https://t.co/CuqzAXkpt3 https://t.co/p1UjSPnPVO https://t.co/85XbVtmT8A https://t.co/YQzxF
RT @Emily_Burns_V: 7/ This is why N-95’s are fit-tested, b/c they offer virtually NO protection with even a 1% gap—as noted in this paper…
@DaveTCM17 @ABridgen We knew they reduce the spread of respiratory viruses before SARS-CoV-2 & still do! https://t.co/cyYD5ORswx https://t.co/YaLpvUlqfi https://t.co/FZHVCCaVvT https://t.co/wOwaiQn9Yz https://t.co/CuqzAXkpt3 https://t.co/p1UjSPnPVO ht
RT @Emily_Burns_V: 7/ This is why N-95’s are fit-tested, b/c they offer virtually NO protection with even a 1% gap—as noted in this paper…
RT @Emily_Burns_V: 7/ This is why N-95’s are fit-tested, b/c they offer virtually NO protection with even a 1% gap—as noted in this paper…
RT @Emily_Burns_V: 7/ This is why N-95’s are fit-tested, b/c they offer virtually NO protection with even a 1% gap—as noted in this paper…
@MetalChick616 @Rodney_ii_back @Metsfan281 @nypost above 50% in the entire 10 nm (0.01 micron) to 6.0 micron range, provided they have a tight weave." -National Center for Biotechnology Information, Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in R
@Lisa6264 @gagen_patricia @NoelFritsch @ComposerBarton @FirstHealth Why are you lying? https://t.co/JJZier1K3N
COVID size is 20NM to 500nm. It's at it's largest size it's almost 1000 times smaller than the gaps in the mask. https://t.co/9JMof2sAjA https://t.co/9OstavzioZ
@shoshanahjacobs Maybe in the future we can actually make a mask that's effective against viruses. But right now none exist outside of Airline respirators which I have used both with tank and chemical oxygen or MK type gas mask with charcoal filters. htt
@assholier @Alberta_UCP @ABDanielleSmith Science like what? That the virus is 1 micron thick and cloth masks protect between 10 nanometers and 10 micrometers? Is that the science you’re looking for? Cloth masks don’t work if you’re in a room with someone m
@NefariousKnut @K_d_a7 @TheoFleury14 Why do you lie? https://t.co/JJZier1K3N
@JibMonkey @PhilStudge @jakki_jax @JenniferNuzzo @Debunk_the_Funk Theres a difference between "population-wide" conclusions (based on weak studies) and the physics of masks. On Debunk's video above, he has many links to various studies. But this shows *ho
@tapas321 @IndependentSage There's a study here from 2020 investigating the filtering efficiencies of different types of cloth: https://t.co/Sjgs8Mc5iZ The advice above is a little optimistic given the suggested materials, but basically, effective cloth m
@JerLeff @aaronsimpson @nathaliejacoby1 This one is interesting too: “Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Masks” https://t.co/Cc5k6FIrR6
@I_never_guess @apmalong well, it's not my viewpoint so i don't have them handy but ... google shows this rabbit hole. Masks protect against exhale particulation. You don't get sick from your own exhale. But from someone else's... https://t.co/SEG5GGtAZH
@TheMatrixStorm @John_P_Topham @thisisnothappen @GFUniteMankind @DrEliDavid 1. Face masks work and we knew it before Covid. https://t.co/cyYD5ORswx https://t.co/YaLpvUlqfi https://t.co/FZHVCCaVvT https://t.co/wOwaiQn9Yz https://t.co/CuqzAXkpt3 https:
@mr_hacki @1900HO Dann gibt es viele Studien, die zeigen dass unterschiedliche Stoffe Aerosol aus der Atemluft entfernen, z.B. diese zufällig ausgewählte Studie. 2/x https://t.co/J4LHkmtfI6
@JoJoFromJerz Repeated for you as before: https://t.co/yROg9po4ni N95 masks protect 95% on 300nm and above. Covid is 50 to 140nm. https://t.co/uOHkRIUgOf Farts while smaller, at .4nm, the same principle applies. The masks do not filter well to that 5
@IAmSherriBerry @JoJoFromJerz Copied from before: https://t.co/yROg9po4ni N95 masks protect 95% on 300nm and above. Covid is 50 to 140nm. https://t.co/uOHkRIUgOf Farts while smaller, at .4nm, the same principle applies. The masks do not filter well t
@JoJoFromJerz https://t.co/yROg9po4ni N95 masks protect 95% on 300nm and above. Covid is 50 to 140nm. https://t.co/uOHkRIUgOf Facts while smaller, at .4nm, the same principle applies. The masks do not filter well to that 50 to 140nm size. You're a co
@nntaleb @DrEliDavid One layer of 600 TPI cotton combined with two layers of chiffon (90% polyester, 10% spandex) had a large particle and small particle blocking efficacy of 99.2% and 97%, as good as an N95 mask https://t.co/SwwgUGeQTG
@avesatanas @TheyCallMeTarz @liz_churchill8 I’m not sure if you are being sincere https://t.co/JJZier1K3N
@vance_lunn @PistolP47127022 @liz_churchill8 That’s a grandiose declaration of them “not working” with zero factual evidence. https://t.co/JJZier1K3N
@DrugTim @hammerlock14 @PeterSweden7 Why don’t you answer my question? Also https://t.co/JJZier1K3N
@Twiligh21059926 @WBATDM @TheFreds Oh dear, I'll take one of these bits of twaddle. Masks work. https://t.co/cyYD5OS0m5 https://t.co/YaLpvUlY4Q https://t.co/FZHVCCbtlr https://t.co/wOwaiQnHO7 https://t.co/CuqzAXkXiB https://t.co/p1UjSPonLm https://t
@DeanGou77434347 @Johnincarlisle @YouTube Coronaviridae and Orthomyxoviridae are different. Masks work. https://t.co/cyYD5OS0m5 https://t.co/YaLpvUlY4Q https://t.co/FZHVCCbtlr https://t.co/wOwaiQnHO7 https://t.co/CuqzAXkXiB https://t.co/p1UjSPonLm h
@NoMoreEds @YourFerntasy @Johnincarlisle @YouTube Masks are effective in reducing outbound transmission of respiratory viruses. https://t.co/cyYD5OS0m5 https://t.co/YaLpvUlY4Q https://t.co/FZHVCCbtlr https://t.co/wOwaiQnHO7 https://t.co/CuqzAXkXiB ht
RT @MakalMakal: A follow-up for anyone interested in the science behind filtration efficiencies: https://t.co/2X50yg6b2R
@WillioJason @PKalashian @DrEliDavid Aerosols are captured via the electro static effect, https://t.co/T7oF6NXMGV
@VyvyFindsWords @catladyactivist @kdqd3 N-95 and other masks also provide some filtration as well, per "Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Masks" that also compared to #N95 masks. https://t.co/6fxFeNL2Wm https://t.co/
RT @WeingartenDE: Die #Studie "#Aerosol #Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth #Masks" belegte, das #Baumwolle,…
@carlosg93420312 @ABridgen Why would you not when they reduce outbound transmission of respiratory viruses? https://t.co/cyYD5ORswx https://t.co/YaLpvUlqfi https://t.co/FZHVCCaVvT https://t.co/wOwaiQn9Yz https://t.co/CuqzAXkpt3 https://t.co/p1UjSPnPV
Empiricism over dogma
RT @RagToo: @GBNEWS Here’s some of that peer reviewed research that the bearded fool states there isn’t https://t.co/eM4BLoHh7X
RT @RagToo: @GBNEWS Here’s some of that peer reviewed research that the bearded fool states there isn’t https://t.co/eM4BLoHh7X
RT @RagToo: @GBNEWS Here’s some of that peer reviewed research that the bearded fool states there isn’t https://t.co/eM4BLoHh7X
RT @walks_sc: @SjMmjs00 @WLancsGP @michael_riordan Science disagrees. https://t.co/cyYD5ORswx https://t.co/YaLpvUlqfi https://t.co/FZHVC…
RT @walks_sc: @Nelia23893053 @GBNEWS Please understand something about outbound transmission https://t.co/cyYD5ORswx https://t.co/YaLpvUlq…
RT @RagToo: @GBNEWS Here’s some of that peer reviewed research that the bearded fool states there isn’t https://t.co/eM4BLoHh7X
@Nelia23893053 @GBNEWS Please understand something about outbound transmission https://t.co/cyYD5ORswx https://t.co/YaLpvUlqfi https://t.co/FZHVCCaVvT https://t.co/wOwaiQn9Yz https://t.co/CuqzAXkpt3 https://t.co/p1UjSPnPVO https://t.co/85XbVtmT8A ht
@SjMmjs00 @mrmarkdolan Your opinion on masks doesn’t trump facts, I’m afraid. I thought you might like to see this:
@nazarinveronica @Threetarns @mrmarkdolan You're wrong. And selfish. https://t.co/5Z3GvHQfKD
@nazarinveronica @Hicksyfern @phgorleston @mrmarkdolan But masks do reduce outbound transmission of respiratory viruses. https://t.co/cyYD5ORswx https://t.co/YaLpvUlqfi https://t.co/FZHVCCaVvT https://t.co/wOwaiQn9Yz https://t.co/CuqzAXkpt3 https://t
You can’t be that curious as you have turned off comments. It you hadn’t you might have learnt something. Masks work, the research backs that up https://t.co/eM4BLoGJip https://t.co/AIk9AscxDA https://t.co/OPQzi8PnyA
@GBNEWS Here’s some of that peer reviewed research that the bearded fool states there isn’t https://t.co/eM4BLoHh7X
@FelipeCardosoG4 @vitorborin_ @PierreKory @elonmusk Really, I’m curious who pays you guys to propagate and disseminate the misinformation - paid parrots. Oh and here’s your mom’s study https://t.co/JJZier1K3N
@bobscartoons They do no harm at all. I expect them to reduce the chance of body fluids expelled into the air, by somebody coughing close to me, from entering my mouth. They obviously do that. Your hysteria is dangerous. You are like a child having a ta
@NicolaFountain1 @drcwhos @drsimonegold Why are you lying? What is your suck agenda? https://t.co/JJZier2hTl
@DjamesieM @paulmurphy_TD Your stupidity is NOT our problem https://t.co/JJZier1K3N
@BillyBakbetter @DrChristineMann @DjamesieM @Doctor_Eric_B @DrEliDavid No answer to my question? And also https://t.co/JJZier2hTl
@NoodleszXX @SpartaJustice Another one who needs enlightenment. It's OK, start with these.... https://t.co/cyYD5ORswx https://t.co/YaLpvUlqfi https://t.co/FZHVCCaVvT https://t.co/wOwaiQn9Yz https://t.co/CuqzAXkpt3 https://t.co/p1UjSPnPVO https://t.c
@JackHodgson7 @EssexPR And yet the research states otherwise https://t.co/eM4BLoGJip
@KeithB3351 @jimeekay @no_masks_at_all @telfordvillan That's a heck of a misguided statement regarding masks, but I am here to help... https://t.co/cyYD5ORswx https://t.co/YaLpvUlqfi https://t.co/FZHVCCaVvT https://t.co/wOwaiQn9Yz https://t.co/CuqzAXk
@dan_mosey @MrSpungoe @GarethJD @EssexPR Oh look here’s another https://t.co/eM4BLoGJip
@Howwethink2 @TakethatCt Oh dear, you went after the profile & masks. Begin your enlightenment with these: https://t.co/cyYD5OS0m5 https://t.co/YaLpvUlY4Q https://t.co/FZHVCCbtlr https://t.co/CuqzAXkXiB https://t.co/p1UjSPonLm https://t.co/85XbVtn
@simonpe22529766 @drclairetaylor Yeah that's not true. its not about the material acting as a mechanical filter but the electrostatic effects of the materials that attract and contain the viruses. https://t.co/n6A6vjlP9H
@Geepawl @ABridgen Oh dear. Begin your enlightenment with these: https://t.co/cyYD5ORswx https://t.co/YaLpvUlqfi https://t.co/FZHVCCaVvT https://t.co/wOwaiQn9Yz https://t.co/CuqzAXkpt3 https://t.co/p1UjSPnPVO https://t.co/85XbVtmT8A https://t.co/YQ
RT @Emily_Burns_V: 7/ This is why N-95’s are fit-tested, b/c they offer virtually NO protection with even a 1% gap—as noted in this paper…
@PeterSweden7 FFS, you don't breathe out viral dust! Read these papers & learn! https://t.co/cyYD5ORswx https://t.co/YaLpvUlqfi https://t.co/FZHVCCaVvT https://t.co/wOwaiQn9Yz https://t.co/CuqzAXkpt3 https://t.co/p1UjSPnPVO https://t.co/85XbVtmT8
@CarolineSeare @ADAMMCC53 @BabeTruth2 @TomiLahren No I “did my own research” 2 years ago https://t.co/JJZier1K3N
@LadyReaper27 @johnMaddox74 @DineshDSouza You can follow the links I provide in this thread to learn more:
@RepThomasMassie Favorite paper of mine as these are “my people” so to speak. https://t.co/SCnVejGr7p