↓ Skip to main content

Successful and Safe Introduction of Laparoscopic Colorectal Cancer Surgery in Dutch Hospitals

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Surgery, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
73 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Successful and Safe Introduction of Laparoscopic Colorectal Cancer Surgery in Dutch Hospitals
Published in
Annals of Surgery, May 2013
DOI 10.1097/sla.0b013e31825d0f37
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nikki E. Kolfschoten, Nicoline J. van Leersum, Gea A. Gooiker, Perla J. Marang van de Mheen, Eric-Hans Eddes, Job Kievit, Ronald Brand, Pieter J. Tanis, Willem A. Bemelman, Rob A. E. M. Tollenaar, Jeroen Meijerink, Michel W. J. M. Wouters

Abstract

To investigate the safety of laparoscopic colorectal cancer resections in a nationwide population-based study.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 48 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 19%
Researcher 8 17%
Other 4 8%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Other 8 17%
Unknown 6 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 65%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Unspecified 1 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 10 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2013.
All research outputs
#8,473,509
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgery
#4,747
of 9,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,279
of 204,335 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgery
#60
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,044 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,335 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.