↓ Skip to main content

Holocentric chromosomes: convergent evolution, meiotic adaptations, and genomic analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Chromosome Research, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
282 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Holocentric chromosomes: convergent evolution, meiotic adaptations, and genomic analysis
Published in
Chromosome Research, July 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10577-012-9292-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniël P. Melters, Leocadia V. Paliulis, Ian F. Korf, Simon W. L. Chan

Abstract

In most eukaryotes, the kinetochore protein complex assembles at a single locus termed the centromere to attach chromosomes to spindle microtubules. Holocentric chromosomes have the unusual property of attaching to spindle microtubules along their entire length. Our mechanistic understanding of holocentric chromosome function is derived largely from studies in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans, but holocentric chromosomes are found over a broad range of animal and plant species. In this review, we describe how holocentricity may be identified through cytological and molecular methods. By surveying the diversity of organisms with holocentric chromosomes, we estimate that the trait has arisen at least 13 independent times (four times in plants and at least nine times in animals). Holocentric chromosomes have inherent problems in meiosis because bivalents can attach to spindles in a random fashion. Interestingly, there are several solutions that have evolved to allow accurate meiotic segregation of holocentric chromosomes. Lastly, we describe how extensive genome sequencing and experiments in nonmodel organisms may allow holocentric chromosomes to shed light on general principles of chromosome segregation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 282 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 2%
Czechia 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Unknown 269 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 63 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 60 21%
Student > Master 33 12%
Student > Bachelor 30 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 6%
Other 41 15%
Unknown 38 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 149 53%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 82 29%
Environmental Science 4 1%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 <1%
Social Sciences 2 <1%
Other 5 2%
Unknown 38 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2023.
All research outputs
#5,336,007
of 25,718,113 outputs
Outputs from Chromosome Research
#77
of 538 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,552
of 178,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chromosome Research
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,718,113 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 538 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,319 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.