↓ Skip to main content

The human tumor microbiome is composed of tumor type–specific intracellular bacteria

Overview of attention for article published in Science, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
1657 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The human tumor microbiome is composed of tumor type–specific intracellular bacteria
Published in
Science, May 2020
DOI 10.1126/science.aay9189
Pubmed ID
Authors

Deborah Nejman, Ilana Livyatan, Garold Fuks, Nancy Gavert, Yaara Zwang, Leore T Geller, Aviva Rotter-Maskowitz, Roi Weiser, Giuseppe Mallel, Elinor Gigi, Arnon Meltser, Gavin M Douglas, Iris Kamer, Vancheswaran Gopalakrishnan, Tali Dadosh, Smadar Levin-Zaidman, Sofia Avnet, Tehila Atlan, Zachary A Cooper, Reetakshi Arora, Alexandria P Cogdill, Md Abdul Wadud Khan, Gabriel Ologun, Yuval Bussi, Adina Weinberger, Maya Lotan-Pompan, Ofra Golani, Gili Perry, Merav Rokah, Keren Bahar-Shany, Elisa A Rozeman, Christian U Blank, Anat Ronai, Ron Shaoul, Amnon Amit, Tatiana Dorfman, Ran Kremer, Zvi R Cohen, Sagi Harnof, Tali Siegal, Einav Yehuda-Shnaidman, Einav Nili Gal-Yam, Hagit Shapira, Nicola Baldini, Morgan G I Langille, Alon Ben-Nun, Bella Kaufman, Aviram Nissan, Talia Golan, Maya Dadiani, Keren Levanon, Jair Bar, Shlomit Yust-Katz, Iris Barshack, Daniel S Peeper, Dan J Raz, Eran Segal, Jennifer A Wargo, Judith Sandbank, Noam Shental, Ravid Straussman

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,049 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,657 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1657 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 269 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 234 14%
Student > Master 148 9%
Student > Bachelor 147 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 85 5%
Other 276 17%
Unknown 498 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 374 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 171 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 160 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 139 8%
Engineering 41 2%
Other 207 12%
Unknown 565 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 994. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2024.
All research outputs
#16,641
of 25,813,008 outputs
Outputs from Science
#827
of 83,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#826
of 432,896 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#52
of 970 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,813,008 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 66.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,896 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 970 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.