↓ Skip to main content

XPR1 mutations are a rare cause of primary familial brain calcification

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurology, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
XPR1 mutations are a rare cause of primary familial brain calcification
Published in
Journal of Neurology, May 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00415-016-8166-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mathieu Anheim, Uriel López-Sánchez, Donatella Giovannini, Anne-Claire Richard, Jawida Touhami, Ludovic N’Guyen, Gabrielle Rudolf, Anne Thibault-Stoll, Thierry Frebourg, Didier Hannequin, Dominique Campion, Jean-Luc Battini, Marc Sitbon, Gaël Nicolas

Abstract

Mutations in XPR1, a gene encoding an inorganic phosphate exporter, have recently been identified in patients with primary familial brain calcification (PFBC). Using Sanger sequencing, we screened XPR1 in 18 unrelated patients with PFBC and no SLC20A2, PDGFB, or PDGFRB mutation. XPR1 variants were tested in an in vitro physiological complementation assay and patient blood cells were assessed ex vivo for phosphate export. We identified a novel c.260T > C, p.(Leu87Pro) XPR1 variant in a 41-year-old man complaining of micrographia and dysarthria and demonstrating mild parkinsonism, cerebellar ataxia and executive dysfunction. Brain (123)I-Ioflupane scintigraphy showed marked dopaminergic neuron loss. Peripheral blood cells from the patient exhibited decreased phosphate export. XPR1 in which we introduced the mutation was not detectable at the cell surface and did not lead to phosphate export. These results confirm that loss of XPR1-mediated phosphate export function causes PFBC, occurring in less than 8 % of cases negative for the other genes, and may be responsible for parkinsonism.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 2%
Unknown 59 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 17%
Student > Bachelor 9 15%
Researcher 7 12%
Student > Master 5 8%
Professor 4 7%
Other 11 18%
Unknown 14 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 20%
Neuroscience 6 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Psychology 3 5%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 16 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2016.
All research outputs
#20,330,976
of 22,875,477 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurology
#3,991
of 4,482 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#289,565
of 337,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurology
#72
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,875,477 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,482 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,040 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.