↓ Skip to main content

Physiological and Biochemical Basis of Clinical Liver Function Tests

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Surgery, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
279 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
291 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Physiological and Biochemical Basis of Clinical Liver Function Tests
Published in
Annals of Surgery, January 2013
DOI 10.1097/sla.0b013e31825d5d47
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lisette T. Hoekstra, Wilmar de Graaf, Geert A. A. Nibourg, Michal Heger, Roelof J. Bennink, Bruno Stieger, Thomas M. van Gulik

Abstract

To review the literature on the most clinically relevant and novel liver function tests used for the assessment of hepatic function before liver surgery.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 291 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 288 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 46 16%
Researcher 37 13%
Student > Master 34 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 7%
Other 58 20%
Unknown 65 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 110 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 16 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 3%
Other 35 12%
Unknown 80 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2020.
All research outputs
#4,788,399
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgery
#2,950
of 9,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,850
of 288,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgery
#38
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,044 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,991 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.