You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Physiological and Biochemical Basis of Clinical Liver Function Tests
|
---|---|
Published in |
Annals of Surgery, January 2013
|
DOI | 10.1097/sla.0b013e31825d5d47 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Lisette T. Hoekstra, Wilmar de Graaf, Geert A. A. Nibourg, Michal Heger, Roelof J. Bennink, Bruno Stieger, Thomas M. van Gulik |
Abstract |
To review the literature on the most clinically relevant and novel liver function tests used for the assessment of hepatic function before liver surgery. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 5 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 291 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 288 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 46 | 16% |
Researcher | 37 | 13% |
Student > Master | 34 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 20 | 7% |
Other | 58 | 20% |
Unknown | 65 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 110 | 38% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 26 | 9% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 5% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 16 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 3% |
Other | 35 | 12% |
Unknown | 80 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2020.
All research outputs
#4,788,399
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgery
#2,950
of 9,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,850
of 288,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgery
#38
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,044 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,991 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.