You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Critical Review of the Harm-Minimisation Tools Available for Electronic Gambling
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Gambling Studies, June 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10899-016-9624-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrew Harris, Mark D. Griffiths |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 1 | 9% |
| Canada | 1 | 9% |
| Finland | 1 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 7 | 64% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 82% |
| Scientists | 2 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 133 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 25 | 19% |
| Unknown | 37 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 38 | 28% |
| Social Sciences | 17 | 13% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 8 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 18 | 13% |
| Unknown | 39 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2022.
All research outputs
#3,209,408
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Gambling Studies
#171
of 1,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,520
of 370,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Gambling Studies
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,051 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,537 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.