↓ Skip to main content

The Role of Intravoxel Incoherent Motion MRI in Predicting Early Treatment Response to Chemoradiation for Metastatic Lymph Nodes in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

Overview of attention for article published in Advances in Therapy, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Role of Intravoxel Incoherent Motion MRI in Predicting Early Treatment Response to Chemoradiation for Metastatic Lymph Nodes in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
Published in
Advances in Therapy, June 2016
DOI 10.1007/s12325-016-0352-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Liyan Lu, Yuehua Li, Wenbin Li

Abstract

Pilot studies have suggested potential clinical applications for intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in head and neck cancers. This study aimed to characterize metastatic lymph nodes using IVIM MRI, and to evaluate the role of IVIM MRI in the prediction of the early treatment response of lymph node metastasis from nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). A total of 122 patients with metastatic lymph nodes from NPC underwent two MRI examinations, pre-treatment and post-treatment (at 4 weeks and at ≥2 years from the end of chemoradiotherapy). Treatment response was assessed using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Differences in the initial IVIM parameters [pure molecular diffusion (D), pseudo-diffusion coefficient (D*), and perfusion fraction (f)] between nodes with a partial response (PR) and a complete response (CR) were analyzed in 102 patients after the exclusion of 20. The initial D*, D, and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) did not reveal a significant difference between nodes showing a PR or a CR. The mean initial f value was significantly higher in patients with a PR relative to patients with a CR (p = 0.003), and its sensitivity and specificity in predicting treatment response to chemoradiotherapy were 86.7% and 100%, respectively. The present study indicated that the initial f value may be more accurate than the initial D*, D, and ADC in the early prediction of treatment response to chemoradiotherapy for metastatic lymph nodes in patients with NPC.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 14%
Researcher 3 14%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 10%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 5 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 62%
Physics and Astronomy 2 10%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Engineering 1 5%
Unknown 4 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2016.
All research outputs
#18,463,662
of 22,877,793 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Therapy
#1,635
of 2,353 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#267,258
of 352,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Therapy
#34
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,877,793 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,353 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,763 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.