You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The effect of GIC‐brand on the survival rate of proximal‐art restorations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry, August 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1365-263x.2012.01259.x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Clarissa Calil Bonifácio, Daniela Hesse, Daniela Prócida Raggio, Marcelo Bönecker, Cor van Loveren, W. Evert van Amerongen |
| Abstract |
Laboratory studies show diverse behaviour of different brands of glass-ionomer cements (GIC). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| India | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 98 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 17 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 9% |
| Professor | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 17% |
| Unknown | 27 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 55 | 56% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
| Psychology | 2 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Unknown | 30 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2012.
All research outputs
#16,900,730
of 24,851,605 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry
#409
of 652 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,954
of 175,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,851,605 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 652 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,246 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.