↓ Skip to main content

A global biophysical typology of mangroves and its relevance for ecosystem structure and deforestation

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
92 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
282 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A global biophysical typology of mangroves and its relevance for ecosystem structure and deforestation
Published in
Scientific Reports, September 2020
DOI 10.1038/s41598-020-71194-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas A. Worthington, Philine S. E. zu Ermgassen, Daniel A. Friess, Ken W. Krauss, Catherine E. Lovelock, Julia Thorley, Rick Tingey, Colin D. Woodroffe, Pete Bunting, Nicole Cormier, David Lagomasino, Richard Lucas, Nicholas J. Murray, William J. Sutherland, Mark Spalding

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 92 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 282 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 282 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 44 16%
Student > Bachelor 39 14%
Student > Master 31 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 3%
Other 40 14%
Unknown 90 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 84 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 12%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 21 7%
Unspecified 7 2%
Engineering 6 2%
Other 26 9%
Unknown 103 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 66. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2023.
All research outputs
#659,299
of 25,809,907 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#7,189
of 143,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,062
of 426,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#230
of 3,988 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,809,907 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 143,161 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,818 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,988 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.