You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Linguistic knowledge, fluency and meta‐cognitive knowledge as components of reading comprehension in adolescent low achievers: differences between monolinguals and bilinguals
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Research in Reading, August 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1467-9817.2012.01539.x |
| Authors |
Mirjam Trapman, Amos van Gelderen, Roel van Steensel, Erik van Schooten, Jan Hulstijn |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 78 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 26% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 20% |
| Lecturer | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 9% |
| Researcher | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 13% |
| Unknown | 15 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 25 | 30% |
| Social Sciences | 20 | 24% |
| Linguistics | 15 | 18% |
| Arts and Humanities | 4 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 15 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2012.
All research outputs
#16,597,003
of 24,417,958 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Research in Reading
#259
of 353 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,108
of 173,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Research in Reading
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,417,958 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 353 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,125 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.