You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Pilot Study of the Efficacy of a Computerized Executive Functioning Remediation Training With Game Elements for Children With ADHD in an Outpatient Setting
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Attention Disorders, August 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1177/1087054712453167 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
S. van der Oord, A. J.G. B. Ponsioen, H. M. Geurts, E. L. Ten Brink, P. J. M. Prins |
| Abstract |
Objective: This pilot study tested the short- and long-term efficacy (9 weeks follow-up) of an executive functioning (EF) remediation training with game elements for children with ADHD in an outpatient clinical setting, using a randomized controlled wait-list design. Furthermore, in a subsample, that is, those treated with methylphenidate, additive effects of the EF training were assessed. Method: A total of 40 children (aged 8-12 years) were randomized to the EF training or wait-list. The training consisted of a 25-session training of inhibition, cognitive flexibility, and working memory. Treatment outcome was assessed by parent- and teacher-rated EF, ADHD, oppositional deviant disorder, and conduct disorder symptoms. Results: Children in the EF training showed significantly more improvement than those in the wait-list condition on parent-rated EF and ADHD behavior in the total sample and in the subsample treated with methylphenidate. Effects were maintained at follow-up. Conclusion: This pilot study shows promising evidence for the efficacy of an EF training with game elements. (J. of Att. Dis. 2012; XX(X) 1-XX). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 25% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 336 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 326 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 58 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 49 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 40 | 12% |
| Researcher | 36 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 5% |
| Other | 47 | 14% |
| Unknown | 90 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 118 | 35% |
| Social Sciences | 21 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 17 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 15 | 4% |
| Other | 47 | 14% |
| Unknown | 98 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2018.
All research outputs
#2,309,606
of 22,675,759 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Attention Disorders
#199
of 1,145 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,671
of 166,800 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Attention Disorders
#3
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,675,759 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,145 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,800 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.