↓ Skip to main content

Diverging Destinies: Maternal Education and the Developmental Gradient in Time With Children

Overview of attention for article published in Demography, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
6 policy sources
twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
263 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Diverging Destinies: Maternal Education and the Developmental Gradient in Time With Children
Published in
Demography, August 2012
DOI 10.1007/s13524-012-0129-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ariel Kalil, Rebecca Ryan, Michael Corey

Abstract

Using data from the 2003-2007 American Time Use Surveys (ATUS), we compare mothers' (N = 6,640) time spent in four parenting activities across maternal education and child age subgroups. We test the hypothesis that highly educated mothers not only spend more time in active child care than less-educated mothers but also alter the composition of that time to suit children's developmental needs more than less-educated mothers. Results support this hypothesis: not only do highly educated mothers invest more time in basic care and play when youngest children are infants or toddlers than when children are older, but differences across education groups in basic care and play time are largest among mothers with infants or toddlers; by contrast, highly educated mothers invest more time in management activities when children are 6 to 13 years old than when children are younger, and differences across education groups in management are largest among mothers with school-aged children. These patterns indicate that the education gradient in mothers' time with children is characterized by a "developmental gradient."

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 263 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Unknown 260 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 66 25%
Student > Master 26 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 10%
Researcher 23 9%
Student > Bachelor 17 6%
Other 39 15%
Unknown 67 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 93 35%
Psychology 32 12%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 22 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 4%
Sports and Recreations 5 2%
Other 23 9%
Unknown 78 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 59. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2022.
All research outputs
#732,749
of 25,769,258 outputs
Outputs from Demography
#204
of 2,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,769
of 187,570 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Demography
#3
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,769,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,022 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,570 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.