@markpoloncarz @JohnsHopkins You’re an idiot “Although, scientific evidence supporting facemasks’ efficacy is lacking, adverse physiological, psychological and health effects are established.” https://t.co/bbE7jsltT2
@dasmoney @ClayTravis I mean, I guess you could start here https://t.co/EUs00IsXXD
@ktibus @OfficialMWalter @VirginAustralia It's just untrue! It's rotten lies! False! Wrong! Untrue! And I won't hear even a single word to the contrary! I can't bear it! Untrue! Make it stop! https://t.co/t0TB1RaG54
@Chris_Hoare @OfficialMWalter @VirginAustralia Is that so? Do you read? Check out this article. No doubt you will become momentarily fixated on the fact it was retracted, but may eventually notice that it refers to abundant prior research, finding masks in
Although, scientific evidence supporting facemasks’ efficacy is lacking, adverse physiological, psychological and health effects are established.” https://t.co/bbE7jsltT2
RT @gable_damon: @ksorbsinnrvoice @maz314Wa facemasks are ineffective to block viral particles O2 (hypoxemia) & increased levels of CO2 (…
RT @gable_damon: @maz314Wa premeditated Crime Mc 🤡 (WHO) no evidence available on the usefulness of masks. In addition to hypoxia & hyper…
RT @gable_damon: @ksorbsinnrvoice @maz314Wa facemasks are ineffective to block viral particles O2 (hypoxemia) & increased levels of CO2 (…
RT @gable_damon: @ksorbsinnrvoice @maz314Wa facemasks are ineffective to block viral particles O2 (hypoxemia) & increased levels of CO2 (…
@ksorbsinnrvoice @maz314Wa facemasks are ineffective to block viral particles O2 (hypoxemia) & increased levels of CO2 (hypercapnia) even 4 few minutes can be severely harmful https://t.co/RyaM79HlkN.
''Sywert van Lienden aangehouden in onderzoek naar mondkapjesdeal'' Nu de rest.
@MisterATeaches @MakeNYFreeAgain “Although, scientific evidence supporting facemasks’ efficacy is lacking, adverse physiological, psychological and health effects are established.” https://t.co/bbE7jsltT2
@IvarezNiel https://t.co/iWS3inS7Rk البته طبق پیش بینی که ذیل این شده بود ریترکت شد! ولی شاید چرخه هنوز ادامه داشته باشد.
@maz314Wa premeditated Crime Mc 🤡 (WHO) no evidence available on the usefulness of masks. In addition to hypoxia & hypercapnia, breathing through facemask residues bacterial & germ components on the inner and outside layer of the facemask. https
@news4buffalo Although, scientific evidence supporting facemasks’ efficacy is lacking, adverse physiological, psychological and health effects are established.” https://t.co/bbE7jsltT2
@TheBuffaloNews “Although, scientific evidence supporting facemasks’ efficacy is lacking, adverse physiological, psychological and health effects are established.” https://t.co/bbE7jsltT2
@birnbaum_paul @gardenchick1 @AnticapEngineer @TerrySmyth4 @Guapaish @SwimmerJlo Weird you can still find it here. https://t.co/ndhtfse83C
@talkRADIO @DeborahMeaden Deborah : the science.... https://t.co/P6sMmcEvzC
@news4buffalo Although, scientific evidence supporting facemasks’ efficacy is lacking, adverse physiological, psychological and health effects are established.” https://t.co/bbE7jsltT2
RT @Tarenagashix: フェイスマスクの弊害の論文 生理的・心理的・健康的影響 - 低酸素血症 - 甲状腺機能低下症 - 息苦しさ - 乳酸濃度の上昇 - pHレベルの低下 - アシドーシス - 毒性 - 炎症 - 自己汚染 - ストレスホルモン(アドレナリン、ノ…
便利な情報、論文がたくさん連なるツイート💚
RT @revoltes: "Les masques faciaux médicaux et non médicaux sont inefficaces pour bloquer la transmission interhumaine de maladies virales…
@edyong209 Read the study: https://t.co/LhfNy7IHJY
@DrJenGunter Right here, all in one place. (Pay no attention to the word RETRACTED plastered all over it.) https://t.co/DHUni4UvHP
@Elizabe85376334 @jkenney The actual study you cite was not peer reviewed and was subsequently retracted but thanks. https://t.co/d1GtvEAWHM
@hZMg9FL4B4nrE8E @rikimiku @funasejuku これこれ。 反コロが「マスクは危険」の根拠として出したのが藤原悠馬氏のブログ記事。 情弱ならそこで「そうなんだ!」となるかもしれないが、私はソースまで辿らなければ納得しません。 そこにあったのが崎⾕博征氏からの引用記事で、辿っって出てきたのがこれです🤣🤣🤣 https://t.co/0DSxeUBOrp
@mehdirhasan Right from NIH!! Facemasks are ineffective to block transmission of viral and infectious disease such as COVID-19. Wearing facemasks has been demonstrated to have substantial adverse physiological and psychological effects. https://t.co/tmpswP
RT @BlogerPisarz: Badanie podsumowuje (podkreślenie dodane): Istniejące dowody naukowe kwestionują bezpieczeństwo i skuteczność noszenia ma…
@AustinWittman5 @RBrulin @karol The masks, all of them, are useless. They just wanted to see how complacent people are. https://t.co/FhWcuhTkbu
@Reece_17 @jmrichards3 @karol If I may add to the education...https://t.co/FhWcuhTkbu
RT @BlogerPisarz: Badanie podsumowuje (podkreślenie dodane): Istniejące dowody naukowe kwestionują bezpieczeństwo i skuteczność noszenia ma…
RT @BlogerPisarz: Badanie podsumowuje (podkreślenie dodane): Istniejące dowody naukowe kwestionują bezpieczeństwo i skuteczność noszenia ma…
Badanie podsumowuje (podkreślenie dodane): Istniejące dowody naukowe kwestionują bezpieczeństwo i skuteczność noszenia maski na twarz jako interwencji zapobiegawczej w przypadku COVID-19.https://t.co/TSDYIbzays https://t.co/UHvBYX0MPl
RT @ATomalty: https://t.co/MBhTrk2uyM Another mask study showing that ordinary cloth masks are useless. Even though this article was retrac…
https://t.co/MBhTrk2uyM Another mask study showing that ordinary cloth masks are useless. Even though this article was retracted by the journal, the reasons for the retraction do not contradict the data and methods used in the study. https://t.co/WDPuLDqbJ
@TruthVsTrumpGOP @kylamb8 Truth obviously doesn't matter to you. Why would you give money to DC lobbyists instead of local shelters that actually work for the care and safety of animals? You are a fraud. https://t.co/WPfffuhLLd
@JennyJenocon https://t.co/FReGt011K6 You are obviously too far gone but here is a nice study from Stanford. And 20 years of studies prior show masks pointless against airborne resp viruses. Australia seems to be a year behind and more terified than the re
@Suewb1 @RepThomasMassie Here's a study!!! https://t.co/dmIAc1eQKZ And here's another one. https://t.co/qBawRtUNKA
@RealEthanBerg @DreyerHope @IAMTHEGREGMAN @robbystarbuck @hollandcourtney No amount of explanation will be sufficient for you. Keep on bowing down to your master the government. https://t.co/qBawRtUNKA
@rdzbr19 @IAMTHEGREGMAN @robbystarbuck @hollandcourtney Because it's not effective... That's what the science says. https://t.co/qBawRtUNKA
@IAMTHEGREGMAN @robbystarbuck @hollandcourtney You're not too bright. "The physical properties of medical and non-medical facemasks suggest that facemasks are ineffective to block viral particles due to their difference in scales." Here's the study. But
Liars gotta lie & stupid people retweet them. Source of the quote in the image: https://t.co/9YU27Bvjmb (Of course the stupid people just copy & paste from some right-wing pigsty online.) THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN RETRACTED. https://t.co/wQ5BzNm2Ub Th
@shelly332 @disclosetv Do you people really lie every time you open your mouth? Your source: https://t.co/9YU27BdIuD (Of course that's not *your* source. You just copied and pasted from some right-wing pigsty.) IT NOW SAYS: THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN RETRACTED.
@John92318516 @PeterPeterV20 This article has been retracted, but references meta analyses and offers simple explanations as to why they’re ineffective and the negative effects on health https://t.co/rUQbRCFEQ2
@tcj @bennyjohnson Hmmm mine trumps your edu, mine is .gov and oh yeah it's the nih! https://t.co/FhWcuhTkbu
RT @TILogAndDiary: @hudikaha @eVDBGQP1vRkvakv 効果が存在しない施策である故に、施策側へは、人々に対して、「マスク代金」を返金する必要性。 この「プランデミック」における全ての施策は、「効果なし」を認識の上にて、運用されてきたものと…
@Sassypaws Also the things that you have said have been retracted a while ago https://t.co/Y10UIp0XbQ https://t.co/J5sUhita2Q It’s important to know the information you spread. Everything you’ve been saying once again retracted a long time ago.
@narinen_arja @SiruMustikkamaa https://t.co/T5c1ehoL8j Physiological/Psychological Effects of Wearing Facemask and Health Consequences: • Hypoxemia • Hypercapnia • Shortness of breath • Increase lactate concentration • Decline in pH levels • Acidosis • Tox
LMAO I was trying to tell people none of the recommendations made any sense. A thousand times smaller.
@hudikaha @eVDBGQP1vRkvakv 効果が存在しない施策である故に、施策側へは、人々に対して、「マスク代金」を返金する必要性。 この「プランデミック」における全ての施策は、「効果なし」を認識の上にて、運用されてきたものと、推察されます。
@Parker5675 @ReopenCASchools I’ll just leave this article from NIH here for you to learn why mask wearing is harmful. https://t.co/XnmbHjxxOH https://t.co/z8DaaRDcDg
@seanhannity Well here's some ammo for them: This study has since been retracted due to the strong arm of Big Pharma’s influencing the NCBI, NLM, and NIH, but still up BECAUSE IT'S STILL TRUE !!https://t.co/AIdXfiHjEt
@Latesha92693624 @GovKathyHochul @CompanyBway Truth on masks, they're dangerous to wear for long periods of time. This study was retracted, but conveniently left up-because they know it's really true. They just had to appease the strong arm of Big Pharma.
@Uber_Support this is supported by many expert testimonials. This is from NIH. Even CDC doesn’t have evidence providing evidence of their efficacy. https://t.co/hgagJ5NeXB
@Free___speech @tedcruz You mean this NIH? https://t.co/juMdIrIZbe Nice. Now move on.
RT @Tarenagashix: フェイスマスクの弊害の論文 生理的・心理的・健康的影響 - 低酸素血症 - 甲状腺機能低下症 - 息苦しさ - 乳酸濃度の上昇 - pHレベルの低下 - アシドーシス - 毒性 - 炎症 - 自己汚染 - ストレスホルモン(アドレナリン、ノ…
@JayDangerous94 @HannahBelden6 @hazin_sam @MonicaCrowley @KamVTV https://t.co/FhWcuhTkbu here's your actual research on the masks.
@Dennispkroeze @Zilvera1 @RutgervdNoort @mrtbollen Wow, een onderzoek zonder dat op de kwalijke bijeffecten van maskers wordt gewezen. Noem eens een land waar men mondmaskers draagt en waar het prima gaat? Hier ook een onderzoek https://t.co/nSRbUsAvz3
RT @stevelanebitch: @ColinDMello @CP24 In 2 years I have yet to see the science for masks...https://t.co/1TK12u7Lyk
RT @stevelanebitch: @ColinDMello @CP24 In 2 years I have yet to see the science for masks...https://t.co/1TK12u7Lyk
@ColinDMello @CP24 In 2 years I have yet to see the science for masks...https://t.co/1TK12u7Lyk
RT @Kes_Nation: @Black_Gryphon @megynkelly You want to preach science? Then I'll give you the science that they don't want you to know beca…
RT @Kes_Nation: @Black_Gryphon @megynkelly You want to preach science? Then I'll give you the science that they don't want you to know beca…
@Black_Gryphon @megynkelly You want to preach science? Then I'll give you the science that they don't want you to know because this is all an agenda about control and you have fallen in line. https://t.co/FhWcuhTkbu
@ToddGac40111620 @megynkelly Have an adult with you with knowledge on how to do proper research. https://t.co/FhWcuhTkbu
@megynkelly As per the nih on their own website the masks don't protect. Democrats cry follow the science so follow the science the masks actually do harm. https://t.co/FhWcuhTkbu
@BenjaminERogers @rggee @KristinBrocoff @RobertGehrke @UtahGOP wow another article, with a retracted fake source - https://t.co/Y3Vu7e8J8n
RT @TILogAndDiary: @elleprovocateur It is presumed that the "mask measures" contain a lot of malicious intent. Reduction of cognitive abil…
@elleprovocateur It is presumed that the "mask measures" contain a lot of malicious intent. Reduction of cognitive ability and health, diluting relationships, etc. The willingness of the ruling class to "weaken the citizens" is tremendous.
@jokathryn238 @AJKayWriter Fauci's outfit, the NIH. Of course, the page showing the WELL REFERENCED information has been "retracted". LOL! Didn't fit the Dr. Mengela...uh, I mean Fauci 2020 narrative. https://t.co/UNj284VAMH
@Purple43213287 @lynnBdalton @chrisnottorie @Telegraph "The existing scientific evidences challenge the safety and efficacy of wearing facemask as preventive intervention for COVID-19. The data suggest that both medical and non-medical facemasks are ineffe
Why was this article retracted again? https://t.co/WYoj9qLtmT
@Suv2015 can you help us with a FOIA request? Need to know who paid the CDC to change this report? @UA_Athletics https://t.co/FaBN4NaEJV
@UA_Athletics https://t.co/FaBN4NaEJV Study mask don’t work before someone paid the CDC to remove it. Who is determined to harm students 24/7.
@MCORLEONE1902 Revisa el documento de la siguiente liga. Hicieron retractarse al autor de su hipotesis de daños por los bozales. https://t.co/1SaXrb3S9K
@kosuke_yasukawa マスクは危険 生理的・心理的な影響と健康への長期的な影響 子供への弊害ドイツ大規模調査結果 感染症に優位な効果がない 論文 https://t.co/7jejt4UUp9 https://t.co/PlNZZhoG5r https://t.co/OjGXZJwS5t
@ryanbeed @Alexandradal1 @danielmalmer @Awithonelison @Rex60242703 You don’t care about 6 per 100,000 but -0.13 per 100,000 is enough to change behavior. Lol. https://t.co/SqKl7plVq4
@sarahbeth345 @colormeboldly Will @NIH reverse the retraction of their article about masks that said the same thing only when it wasn't politically expedient to say so? https://t.co/3dzmAXoHmB
@lisabeeplants @call210 @KatyOnMSNBC @VinGuptaMD SEE "Efficacy of facemasks" IN THIS RETRACTED NIH ARTICLE/ LOOKS TO ME THAT THE REASONING FOR THE RETRACTION IS SKETCHY AT BEST https://t.co/ysJQXXODU3