↓ Skip to main content

The development of chance measurement

Overview of attention for article published in Mathematics Education Research Journal, May 1997
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The development of chance measurement
Published in
Mathematics Education Research Journal, May 1997
DOI 10.1007/bf03217302
Authors

Jane M. Watson, Kevin F. Collis, Jonathan B. Moritz

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 7%
Unknown 13 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 29%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 21%
Other 1 7%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Lecturer 1 7%
Other 2 14%
Unknown 2 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 8 57%
Psychology 2 14%
Mathematics 2 14%
Unknown 2 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2001.
All research outputs
#7,485,894
of 22,880,230 outputs
Outputs from Mathematics Education Research Journal
#89
of 333 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,507
of 30,684 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mathematics Education Research Journal
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,880,230 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 333 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 30,684 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them