↓ Skip to main content

Correlates of HIV Risk Among Injecting Drug Users in Sixteen Ukrainian Cities

Overview of attention for article published in AIDS and Behavior, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
3 policy sources
twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Correlates of HIV Risk Among Injecting Drug Users in Sixteen Ukrainian Cities
Published in
AIDS and Behavior, September 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10461-010-9817-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yuriy S. Taran, Lisa G. Johnston, Nataliia B. Pohorila, Tetiana O. Saliuk

Abstract

We present findings from a HIV survey using respondent driven sampling among 3,711 injecting drug users (IDUs) in 16 cities in Ukraine in 2008. Eligible participants were males and females who injected drugs in the past 1 month, ≥ 16 years and lived/worked in their respective interview area. The impact of injecting and sexual risk behaviors on HIV-infection were analyzed using four logistic models. Overall HIV prevalence was 32%. In the sexual risk model, paying for sex in the past 3 months and condom use during last sex increased the odds of HIV infection. Being female, having greater than 3 years of injection drug use, always sharing equipment and using alcohol with drugs in the past month remained significant in all four models. These findings indicate the urgent need to scale up peer education, needle exchange and methadone substitution programs for IDUs with specific programs targeting the needs of female injectors.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Poland 1 1%
Unknown 66 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 19%
Student > Master 13 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 6%
Other 15 22%
Unknown 14 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 30%
Social Sciences 12 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Psychology 2 3%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 16 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2013.
All research outputs
#3,160,007
of 24,755,976 outputs
Outputs from AIDS and Behavior
#452
of 3,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,513
of 103,580 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AIDS and Behavior
#3
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,755,976 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,646 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,580 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.