↓ Skip to main content

Myths, facts and conditional truths: What is the evidence on the risks associated with smoking in cars carrying children?

Overview of attention for article published in Canadian Medical Association Journal, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
26 X users

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Myths, facts and conditional truths: What is the evidence on the risks associated with smoking in cars carrying children?
Published in
Canadian Medical Association Journal, January 2011
DOI 10.1503/cmaj.100903
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ray Pawson, Geoff Wong, Lesley Owen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 4%
Unknown 23 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 46%
Professor 2 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 3 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 8 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 13%
Psychology 1 4%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 6 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2020.
All research outputs
#2,342,988
of 25,809,907 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#2,589
of 9,556 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,887
of 194,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#17
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,809,907 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,556 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,048 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.