You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A Phase II study of autologous mesenchymal stromal cells and c‐kit positive cardiac cells, alone or in combination, in patients with ischaemic heart failure: the CCTRN CONCERT‐HF trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
European Journal of Heart Failure, April 2021
|
DOI | 10.1002/ejhf.2178 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Roberto Bolli, Raul D. Mitrani, Joshua M. Hare, Carl J. Pepine, Emerson C. Perin, James T. Willerson, Jay H. Traverse, Timothy D. Henry, Phillip C. Yang, Michael P. Murphy, Keith L. March, Ivonne H. Schulman, Sohail Ikram, David P. Lee, Connor O'Brien, Joao A. Lima, Mohammad R. Ostovaneh, Bharath Ambale‐Venkatesh, Gregory Lewis, Aisha Khan, Ketty Bacallao, Krystalenia Valasaki, Bangon Longsomboon, Adrian P. Gee, Sara Richman, Doris A. Taylor, Dejian Lai, Shelly L. Sayre, Judy Bettencourt, Rachel W. Vojvodic, Michelle L. Cohen, Lara Simpson, David Aguilar, Catalin Loghin, Lem Moyé, Ray F. Ebert, Barry R. Davis, Robert D. Simari, for the Cardiovascular Cell Therapy Research Network |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 21% |
France | 3 | 21% |
Netherlands | 1 | 7% |
Mexico | 1 | 7% |
Italy | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 5 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 10 | 71% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 14% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 80 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 10% |
Researcher | 6 | 8% |
Student > Master | 6 | 8% |
Unspecified | 6 | 8% |
Other | 20 | 25% |
Unknown | 26 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 19% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 13% |
Unspecified | 6 | 8% |
Engineering | 5 | 6% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 4% |
Other | 12 | 15% |
Unknown | 29 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 74. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2023.
All research outputs
#587,272
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Heart Failure
#129
of 2,620 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,905
of 459,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Heart Failure
#9
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,620 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 459,089 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.