↓ Skip to main content

Cardiac surgeons' concerns, perceptions, and responses during the COVID‐19 pandemic

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cardiac Surgery, June 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cardiac surgeons' concerns, perceptions, and responses during the COVID‐19 pandemic
Published in
Journal of Cardiac Surgery, June 2021
DOI 10.1111/jocs.15681
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jessica G.Y. Luc, Niv Ad, Tom C. Nguyen, the COVID‐19 North American Cardiac Surgery Survey Working Group Collaborators, Rakesh C. Arora, Husam H. Balkhy, Edward M. Bender, Daniel M. Bethencourt, Gianluigi Bisleri, Douglas Boyd, Michael W.A. Chu, Kim I. de la Cruz, Abe DeAnda, Daniel T. Engelman, Emily A. Farkas, Lynn M. Fedoruk, Michael Fiocco, Jessica Forcillo, Guy Fradet, Stephen E. Fremes, James S. Gammie, Arnar Geirsson, Marc W. Gerdisch, Leonard N. Girard, Clayton A. Kaiser, Tsuyoshi Kaneko, William D.T. Kent, Kamal R. Khabbaz, Ali Khoynezhad, Bob Kiaii, Richard Lee, Jean‐Francois Legare, Eric J. Lehr, Roderick G.G. MacArthur, Patrick M. McCarthy, John R. Mehall, Walter H. Merrill, Marc R. Moon, Maral Ouzounian, Matthias Peltz, Louis P. Perrault, Ourania Preventza, Mahesh Ramchandani, Basel Ramlawi, Rawn Salenger, Michael E. Sekela, Frank W. Sellke, John M. Stulak, Francis P. Sutter, Tomasz A. Timek, Glenn Whitman, Judson B. Williams, Daniel R. Wong, Bobby Yanagawa, Jian Ye, Sanford M. Zeigler

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 20%
Other 3 7%
Professor 3 7%
Lecturer 1 2%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 25 54%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 10 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 4%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 24 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2021.
All research outputs
#3,667,354
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cardiac Surgery
#72
of 1,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,042
of 446,903 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cardiac Surgery
#5
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,552 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,903 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.