Altmetric Blog

Altmetric review: top 100 most cited papers

Cat Williams, 6th November 2014

You might have seen the article published recently in Nature which look at the top 100 most highly cited papers from 1900 onwards, based on data from the Thomson Reuters Web of Science Database.

The article highlighted that it is (perhaps unsurprisingly) much older articles that have accrued the majority of citations to date and therefore dominate the list – with more recent breakthroughs and nobel-prize winning advances struggling to compete with the 12,119 citations it would take to rank in the top 100.

So we were curious to see what other kind of attention these articles might have been receiving in recent years. At Altmetric our data goes back reliably until November 2012 – meaning that we have been tracking our sources for any mentions of those articles since then. A search in the Altmetric Explorer tells us that since November 2012 we have seen 287 mentions in total for the 52 of the 84 articles in the top 100 list that were listed with a DOI or other unique identifier.

The oldest paper from the list that our database contains a mention of is The attractions of proteins for small molecules and ions, published in 1949 in the Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. The (joint) 3rd oldest article in the top 100 list, in April 2013 we picked up a mention of the paper from a Japanese researcher on Twitter:

The tweet went on to be favourited by 2 other Twitter users, both researchers themselves; an interesting example of how core literature is being shared amongst peers online, even decades after publication.

Of the 52 articles we had picked up mentions for, 5 had been mentioned in mainstream news outlets in the last 2 years:

[altmetric doi=”10.1126/science.1102896″ float=”right”]Electric Field Effect in Atomically Thin Carbon Films
Science

 

[altmetric doi=”10.1007/BF00656997″ float=”right”]Improved patch-clamp techniques for high-resolution current recording from cells and cell-free membrane patches
Pflügers Archiv

 

[altmetric doi=”10.1021/j100785a001″ float=”right”] van der Waals Volumes and Radii
The Journal of Physical Chemistry

 

[altmetric doi=”10.1212/WNL.34.7.939″ float=”right”]Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease
Neurology

 

[altmetric doi=”10.1038/256495a0″ float=”right”]Continuous cultures of fused cells secreting antibody of predefined specificity
Nature

 

 

[altmetric doi=”10.1136/jnnp.23.1.56″ float=”right”] Just one article in the set, A rating scale for depression, had been referenced in a policy document source we track: Lithium or an atypical antipsychotic drug in the management of treatment-resistant depression: a systematic review and economic evaluation – part of the NICE Evidence Search Collection. Our policy documents sources are expanding every week so this statistic may change over time as our coverage grows.

It’s interesting to see that many of these older articles, quite apart from just citations, are still generating attention online. The original data is available below if you’d like to take a look at all of the mentions we’ve seen for each article.

Our full dataset for mentions of these articles is available here.

And the original Nature article can be found here.

13 Responses to “Altmetric review: top 100 most cited papers”

Altmetric (@altmetric)
November 6, 2014 at 12:00 am

A review of @altmetric #altmetrics coverage of the top 100 most cited articles: http://t.co/jmvTraGHLt (cc @naturenews)

Digital Science (@digitalsci)
November 6, 2014 at 12:00 am

.@altmetric have taken a look at the recent @NatureNews 100 most cited articles coverage - really interesting stuff! http://t.co/Al3odrJKXn

Lou Woodley (@LouWoodley)
November 6, 2014 at 12:00 am

The most cited 100 scientific papers - how do they fare in terms of mentions detected by @altmetric? http://t.co/PuakArpwT8

Scott Matthewman (@scottm)
November 6, 2014 at 12:00 am

A look at how @NatureNews's 100 most cited papers are tracked by @altmetric http://t.co/wFIVVNGtgN

Fred Smithson
November 6, 2014 at 12:00 am

Why no mention of the Google list also mentioned in the Nature article?

g

Xavier Lasauca (@xavierlasauca)
November 8, 2014 at 12:00 am

+1! The most cited 100 scientific papers – how do they fare in terms of mentions detected by @altmetric? http://t.co/HUALj96GXk #altmetrics

Ben McLeish (@BenMcLeish)
November 9, 2014 at 12:00 am

Altmetric review: top 100 most cited papers | http://t.co/9pEFKFZj0k http://t.co/JSBEmTpNVp

URLs of wisdom (9th November) | Social in silico
November 10, 2014 at 12:00 am

[…] The top 100 most cited papers – and how they compare when examined using Altmetrics. […]

Christine Stohn (@TINEIRS)
November 10, 2014 at 12:00 am

Altmetric review: top 100 most cited papers | http://t.co/YO10J5q7T0 http://t.co/vVxjWoJ56e

@lfvscience20
November 12, 2014 at 12:00 am

Altmetric review: top 100 most cited papers #altmetrics http://t.co/LkMuQWELb4

@bokasafn
November 12, 2014 at 12:00 am

Top 100 most cited papers #scholarlycommunication
#altmetric #nature http://t.co/SdnmMWWCX6

[…] RT @altmetric: A review of @altmetric #altmetrics coverage of the top 100 most cited articles: http://t.co/jmvTraGHLt (cc @naturenews)  […]

@LppsTweet
November 17, 2014 at 12:00 am

Altmetric review: top 100 most cited papersより⇒http://t.co/oOyPnEbcjV

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *