↓ Skip to main content

Multidisciplinary meeting about the use of direct oral anticoagulants in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.

Overview of attention for article published in Archivos de cardiología de México, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Multidisciplinary meeting about the use of direct oral anticoagulants in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.
Published in
Archivos de cardiología de México, August 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.acmx.2016.06.006
Pubmed ID
Authors

Humberto Rodríguez-Reyes, Antonio Arauz-Góngora, Enrique Asensio-Lafuente, Manuel de Jesús Celaya-Cota, Alejandro Cordero-Cabra, Milton Guevara-Valdivia, Raúl Izaguirre-Avila, Susano Lara-Vaca, Vitelio Mariona-Moreno, Enrique Martínez-Flores, Santiago Nava-Townsend, Gerardo Pozas-Garza, Gerardo Rodríguez-Diez

Abstract

Knowing the real impact of atrial fibrillation in the stroke, the Sociedad Mexicana of Electrofisiología y Estimulación Cardiaca (SOMEEC) had the initiative to develop a multidisciplinary meeting of experts the with the purpose to update the available scientific evidence from clinical practice guidelines, meta-analyses, controlled clinical trials, and complementing with the experience and views of a group of experts. To meet this goal, SOMEEC gathered a group of specialists in the area of cardiology, electrophysiology, neurology and hematology that given their experience in certain areas, they share the scientific evidence with the panel of experts to leave open a discussion about the information presented in this article. This document brings together the best scientific evidence available and aims to be a useful tool in the decision to use of new oral anticoagulants in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and ischemic heart disease, or relating to the management of patients with stroke or renal failure, and even those that will be submitted to elective surgery and invasive procedures. In the same, they handled comparative schemes of follow-up and treatment which simplifies the decision making by the specialists participants.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 16%
Student > Master 4 13%
Other 3 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 9 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 39%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Unknown 11 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2021.
All research outputs
#17,286,645
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Archivos de cardiología de México
#97
of 237 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#228,420
of 348,929 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archivos de cardiología de México
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 237 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,929 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them