↓ Skip to main content

Prevalence and risk factors associated with peripheral arterial disease in an adult population from Colombia.

Overview of attention for article published in Archivos de cardiología de México, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prevalence and risk factors associated with peripheral arterial disease in an adult population from Colombia.
Published in
Archivos de cardiología de México, June 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.acmx.2017.02.002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lorena Urbano, Eliana Portilla, Wilson Muñoz, Albert Hofman, Carlos H Sierra-Torres

Abstract

Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are the most important cause of mortality in Latin America while peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is the third leading cause of atherosclerotic cardiovascular morbidity. To establish the prevalence of PAD and the distribution of traditional CVD risk factors in a population from the Department of Cauca, Colombia. A cross-sectional study was performed in a total of 10,000 subjects aged ≥40 years from 36 municipalities. An ankle-brachial index (ABI) ≤0.9 in either leg was used diagnostic criterion of PAD. Overall PAD prevalence was 4.4% (4.7% females vs. 4.0% males), with diabetes being the most prevalent risk factor (23%). Among individuals self-reporting a history of acute myocardial infarction or stroke, PAD prevalence was 31.0% and 8.1%, respectively. After adjusting for potential confounders, PAD was significantly associated to hypertension (OR 4.6; 95% CI 3.42-6.20), diabetes (4.3; 3.17-5.75), dyslipidemia (3.1; 2.50-3.88), obesity (1.8; 1.37-2.30) and cigarette smoking (1.6; 1.26-1.94). Analysis for the interaction of risk factors showed that diabetes, dyslipidemia and obesity accounted for 13.2 times the risk for PAD (6.9-25.4), and when adding hypertension to the model, the risk effect was the highest (17.2; 8.4-35.1). Hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, and obesity but not smoking were strong predictors of PAD. ABI measurement should be routinely conducted as a screening test in intermediate and high-risk patients for CVD prevention. This will allow for early intervention and follow up on populations at risk, thus, contributing to improve strategies for reducing CVD burden.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 121 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 19 16%
Student > Master 12 10%
Researcher 8 7%
Student > Postgraduate 8 7%
Other 7 6%
Other 14 12%
Unknown 53 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 4%
Psychology 2 2%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 51 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2017.
All research outputs
#20,660,571
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Archivos de cardiología de México
#142
of 237 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#255,280
of 331,711 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archivos de cardiología de México
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 237 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,711 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.