↓ Skip to main content

Intraoperative goal directed hemodynamic therapy in noncardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Intraoperative goal directed hemodynamic therapy in noncardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology, September 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.bjane.2015.02.001
Pubmed ID
Authors

Javier Ripollés, Angel Espinosa, Eugenio Martínez-Hurtado, Alfredo Abad-Gurumeta, Rubén Casans-Francés, Cristina Fernández-Pérez, Francisco López-Timoneda, José María Calvo-Vecino, EAR Group

Abstract

The goal directed hemodynamic therapy is an approach focused on the use of cardiac output and related parameters as end-points for fluids and drugs to optimize tissue perfusion and oxygen delivery. Primary aim: To determine the effects of intraoperative goal directed hemodynamic therapy on postoperative complications rates. A meta-analysis was carried out of the effects of goal directed hemodynamic therapy in adult noncardiac surgery on postoperative complications and mortality using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses methodology. A systematic search was performed in Medline PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library (last update, October 2014). Inclusion criteria were randomized clinical trials in which intraoperative goal directed hemodynamic therapy was compared to conventional fluid management in noncardiac surgery. Exclusion criteria were trauma and pediatric surgery studies and that using pulmonary artery catheter. End-points were postoperative complications (primary) and mortality (secondary). Those studies that fulfilled the entry criteria were examined in full and subjected to quantifiable analysis, predefined subgroup analysis (stratified by type of monitor, therapy, and hemodynamic goal), and predefined sensitivity analysis. 51 RCTs were initially identified, 24 fulfilling the inclusion criteria. 5 randomized clinical trials were added by manual search, resulting in 29 randomized clinical trials in the final analysis, including 2654 patients. A significant reduction in complications for goal directed hemodynamic therapy was observed (RR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.62-0.79, p<0.001). No significant decrease in mortality was achieved (RR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.45-1.28, p=0.30). Quality sensitive analyses confirmed the main overall results. Intraoperative goal directed hemodynamic therapy with minimally invasive monitoring decreases postoperative complications in noncardiac surgery, although it was not able to show a significant decrease in mortality rate.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 40 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 12%
Student > Bachelor 5 12%
Researcher 4 10%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Other 2 5%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 16 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 7%
Psychology 2 5%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 17 41%