↓ Skip to main content

Application of the ATLAS score for evaluating the severity of Clostridium difficile infection in teaching hospitals in Mexico

Overview of attention for article published in Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Application of the ATLAS score for evaluating the severity of Clostridium difficile infection in teaching hospitals in Mexico
Published in
Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases, June 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.bjid.2015.05.005
Pubmed ID
Authors

Raúl Hernández-García, Elvira Garza-González, Mark Miller, Giovanna Arteaga-Muller, Alejandra María Galván-de los Santos, Adrián Camacho-Ortiz

Abstract

For clinicians, a practical bedside tool for severity assessment and prognosis of patients with Clostridium difficile infection is a highly desirable unmet medical need. Two general teaching hospitals in northeast Mexico. Adult patients with C. difficile infection. Prospective observational study. Patients included had a median of 48 years of age, 54% of male gender and an average of 24.3 days length of hospital stay. Third generation cephalosporins were the antibiotics most commonly used prior to C. difficile infection diagnosis. Patients diagnosed with C. difficile infection had a median ATLAS score of 4 and 56.7% of the subjects had a score between 4 and 7 points. Patients with a score of 8 through 10 points had 100% mortality. The ATLAS score is a potentially useful tool for the routine evaluation of patients at the time of C. difficile infection diagnosis. At 30 days post-diagnosis, patients with a score of ≤3 points had 100% survival while all of those with scores ≥8 died. Patients with scores between 4 and 7 points had a greater probability of colectomy with an overall cure rate of 70.1%.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 51 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 15 29%
Researcher 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Student > Master 3 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 9 18%
Unknown 12 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 39%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 6%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 14 27%