↓ Skip to main content

Visceral Leishmaniasis/HIV co-infection in northeast Brazil: evaluation of outcome

Overview of attention for article published in Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
108 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Visceral Leishmaniasis/HIV co-infection in northeast Brazil: evaluation of outcome
Published in
Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases, September 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.bjid.2015.07.004
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lara Gurgel Fernandes Távora, Marina Bizerril Nogueira, Sofia Teixeira Gomes

Abstract

Since the beginning of the HIV burden, VL/HIV co-infection has been diagnosed not only in areas where VL is endemic (Latin America, India, Asia, Southern Europe), but also in North America, were it is considered an opportunistic disease. Clinical presentation, diagnostic tests sensitivity and treatment response in this population differs from VL alone. To evaluate factors related to an unfavorable outcome in patients with VL/HIV diagnosis in a reference center in northeast Brazil. Co-infected patients, diagnosed from 2010 to 2012, were included. Data from medical records were collected until one year after VL treatment completion. Forty-two HIV-infected patients were included in the study. Anemia, leukopenia, and thrombocytopenia were present in 95%, 70.7%, and 63.4%, respectively. Mean T CD4+ (LTCD4) lymphocyte count was 183 cells/dL. Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) was being used by 54.7% of cases. A favorable outcome was seen in 71.4% of cases. Recurrence of VL occurred in nine patients and deaths were secondary to infectious complications (3/42 patients). Very low LTCD4 count (<100 cells/dL) was the only independent variable associated with an unfavorable outcome in multivariate analysis (p=0.03). Low LTCD4 count at presentation was associated with unfavorable outcome in VL/HIV patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 107 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 16%
Researcher 9 8%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 17 16%
Unknown 31 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 6%
Other 19 18%
Unknown 40 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2022.
All research outputs
#6,275,484
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases
#106
of 809 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,095
of 279,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases
#2
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 809 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,887 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.