↓ Skip to main content

Mobile health application to assist doctors in antibiotic prescription – an approach for antibiotic stewardship

Overview of attention for article published in Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
125 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mobile health application to assist doctors in antibiotic prescription – an approach for antibiotic stewardship
Published in
Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases, September 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.bjid.2017.08.002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Felipe Francisco Tuon, Juliano Gasparetto, Luciana Cristina Wollmann, Thyago Proença de Moraes

Abstract

Technologies applied to mobile devices can be an important strategy in antibiotic stewardship programs. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of a decision-making application on antibiotic prescription. This was an observational, analytical and longitudinal study on the implementation of an antimicrobial guide for mobile application (app). This study analyzed the period of 12 months before and 12 months after the app implementation at a university hospital based on local epidemiology, avoiding high cost drugs and reducing the potential for drug resistance including carbapenem. Antimicrobials consumption was evaluated in DDD/1000 patients-day and direct expenses converted into USD. The monthly average consumption of aminoglycosides and cefepime had a statistically significant increase (p<0.05), while the consumption of piperacillin/tazobactam and meropenem was significantly decreased (p<0.05). The sensitivity to meropenem as well as to polymyxin increased after the app implementation. A decrease in sensitivity to cefepime was observed after introduction of this antibiotic as a substitute of piperacillin/tazobactam for treating intra-hospital infections. There was a net saving of USD 296,485.90 (p<0.05). An antibiotic protocol in the app can help antibiotic stewardship reducing cost, changing the microbiological profile and antimicrobial consumption.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 125 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 24%
Researcher 14 11%
Student > Bachelor 12 10%
Other 10 8%
Student > Postgraduate 9 7%
Other 20 16%
Unknown 30 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 20%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 17 14%
Computer Science 10 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 3%
Other 27 22%
Unknown 34 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2018.
All research outputs
#7,780,614
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases
#125
of 809 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,108
of 325,640 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 809 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,640 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them