↓ Skip to main content

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from an intensive care unit in Minas Gerais, Brazil, over a six-year period

Overview of attention for article published in Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from an intensive care unit in Minas Gerais, Brazil, over a six-year period
Published in
Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases, November 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.bjid.2017.10.004
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thiago C. Nascimento, Cláudio G. Diniz, Vânia L. Silva, Alessandra B. Ferreira-Machado, Marina O. Fajardo, Tamara Lopes R. de Oliveira, Dennis de C. Ferreira, Fernanda S. Cavalcante, Kátia R. Netto dos Santos

Abstract

To characterize methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates from an intensive care unit of a tertiary-care teaching hospital, between 2005 and 2010. A total of 45 MRSA isolates were recovered from patients admitted to the ICU in the study period. Resistance rates higher than 80% were found for clindamycin (100%), erythromycin (100%), levofloxacin (100%), azithromycin (97.7%), rifampin (88.8%), and gentamycin (86.6%). The SCCmec typing revealed that the isolates harbored the types III (66.7%), II (17.8%), IV (4.4%), and I (2.2%). Four (8.9%) isolates carried non-typeable cassettes. Most (66.7%) of the MRSA isolates were related to the Brazilian endemic clone (BEC)/CC8/SCCmec III, which was prevalent (89.3%) between 2005 and 2007, while the USA100/CC5/SCCmec II lineage emerged in 2007 and was more frequent in the last few years. The study showed high rates of antimicrobial resistance among MRSA isolates and the replacement of BEC, a well-established hospital lineage, by the USA100 in the late 2000s, at the ICU under study.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 14%
Student > Bachelor 5 12%
Researcher 3 7%
Professor 3 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 10 23%
Unknown 14 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 6 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Unspecified 2 5%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 16 37%