You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Validation of the GeneXpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 PCR assay using saliva as biological specimen
|
---|---|
Published in |
Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases, February 2021
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.bjid.2021.101543 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sara Nunes Vaz, Daniele Souza de Santana, Eduardo Martins Netto, Wei-Kung Wang, Carlos Brites |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 53 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 11% |
Researcher | 5 | 9% |
Student > Master | 3 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
Other | 9 | 17% |
Unknown | 21 | 40% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 21% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 4% |
Other | 6 | 11% |
Unknown | 25 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2021.
All research outputs
#6,631,394
of 25,477,125 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases
#108
of 812 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,524
of 558,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases
#5
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,477,125 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 812 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 558,543 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.