↓ Skip to main content

Brazilian guidelines for the treatment of outpatients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19. A joint guideline of the Brazilian Association of Emergency Medicine (ABRAMEDE), Brazilian Medical…

Overview of attention for article published in Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases, March 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#11 of 811)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
22 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Brazilian guidelines for the treatment of outpatients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19. A joint guideline of the Brazilian Association of Emergency Medicine (ABRAMEDE), Brazilian Medical Association (AMB), Brazilian Society of Angiology and Vascular Surgery (SBACV), Brazilian Society of Geriatrics and Gerontology (SBGG), Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases (SBI), Brazilian Society of Family and Community Medicine (SBFMC), and Brazilian Thoracic Society (SBPT)
Published in
Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases, March 2022
DOI 10.1016/j.bjid.2022.102347
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maicon Falavigna, Karlyse Claudino Belli, Alexandre Naime Barbosa, Alexandre Prehn Zavascki, Ana Catharina de Seixas Santos Nastri, Christiane Machado Santana, Cinara Stein, Débora Dalmas Gräf, Flavio Adsuara Cadegiani, Hélio Penna Guimarães, José Tadeu Monteiro, Juliana Carvalho Ferreira, Luciano Cesar Pontes de Azevedo, Marcelo Mihailenko Chaves Magri, Marcone Lima Sobreira, Maria Beatriz Gandra de Souza Dias, Maura Salaroli de Oliveira, Mirian de Freitas Dal Ben Corradi, Regis Rosa, Ricardo Souza Heinzelmann, Rosemeri Maurici da Silva, Rubens Belfort, Sergio Cimerman, Verônica Colpani, Viviane Cordeiro Veiga, Carlos Roberto Ribeiro de Carvalho

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 57 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Professor 3 5%
Lecturer 3 5%
Student > Master 3 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 5%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 31 54%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Engineering 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 34 60%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,329,398
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases
#11
of 811 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,971
of 464,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases
#1
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 811 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 464,088 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.