↓ Skip to main content

Microbiology of organic and conventionally grown fresh produce

Overview of attention for article published in Brazilian Journal of Microbiology, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#18 of 1,382)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
11 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
212 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Microbiology of organic and conventionally grown fresh produce
Published in
Brazilian Journal of Microbiology, October 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.bjm.2016.10.006
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniele F. Maffei, Erika Y. Batalha, Mariza Landgraf, Donald W. Schaffner, Bernadette D.G.M. Franco

Abstract

Fresh produce is a generalized term for a group of farm-produced crops, including fruits and vegetables. Organic agriculture has been on the rise and attracting the attention of the food production sector, since it uses eco-agricultural principles that are ostensibly environmentally-friendly and provides products potentially free from the residues of agrochemicals. Organic farming practices such as the use of animal manure can however increase the risk of contamination by enteric pathogenic microorganisms and may consequently pose health risks. A number of scientific studies conducted in different countries have compared the microbiological quality of produce samples from organic and conventional production and results are contradictory. While some have reported greater microbial counts in fresh produce from organic production, other studies do not. This manuscript provides a brief review of the current knowledge and summarizes data on the occurrence of pathogenic microorganisms in vegetables from organic production.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 212 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 1%
Armenia 1 <1%
Unknown 208 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 39 18%
Student > Master 32 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 12%
Researcher 14 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 7%
Other 26 12%
Unknown 62 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 60 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 14 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 3%
Other 30 14%
Unknown 77 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,717,232
of 25,413,176 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Journal of Microbiology
#18
of 1,382 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,343
of 321,098 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Journal of Microbiology
#3
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,413,176 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,382 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,098 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.