↓ Skip to main content

In vitro antimicrobial activity of Luffa operculata

Overview of attention for article published in Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
In vitro antimicrobial activity of Luffa operculata
Published in
Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, December 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.bjorl.2014.07.015
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rodolfo Alexander Scalia, José Eduardo Lutaif Dolci, Suely Mitoi Ykko Ueda, Suzethe Matiko Sassagawa

Abstract

Luffa operculata is probably one of the most popular herbal medicines used in the treatment of rhinitis and rhinosinusitis. However, its specific mechanism of action is still unknown. To evaluate in vitro antibacterial activity of L. operculata against three ordinary agents of upper respiratory tract infection: Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pneumoniae and Streptococcus pyogenes. Different concentrations of L. operculata alcoholic extract were applied to bacterial broth containing reference and community strains of the three described agents. After a 24-h incubation period, the bacterial culture turbidity was measured. The samples were then inoculated onto Mueller-Hinton and human blood agar plates. Bacterial growth was analyzed after 24- and 48-h incubation period. The test was considered negative when there was no environmental turbidity, confirmed by the absence of bacterial growth into the inoculated plates. Tests were considered positive when either turbidity changes were observed on the bacterial broth or when bacterial growth was detected on inoculated plates. Appropriate statistical analysis of the data was performed. L. operculata extracts showed antibacterial activity mainly to S. pyogenes followed by S. pneumoniae and S. aureus. L. operculata extract showed promising antibacterial activity in vitro against the studied agents.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 2%
Unknown 52 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 13%
Student > Bachelor 7 13%
Student > Master 5 9%
Other 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 19 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Engineering 3 6%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 23 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2020.
All research outputs
#8,261,756
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology
#130
of 726 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,018
of 360,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 726 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,107 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them