↓ Skip to main content

Treatment of tympanic membrane perforation using bacterial cellulose: a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
115 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Treatment of tympanic membrane perforation using bacterial cellulose: a randomized controlled trial
Published in
Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, September 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.bjorl.2015.03.015
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fábio Coelho Alves Silveira, Flávia Cristina Morone Pinto, Sílvio da Silva Caldas Neto, Mariana de Carvalho Leal, Jéssica Cesário, José Lamartine de Andrade Aguiar

Abstract

Promising treatments for tympanic membrane perforation closure have been studied. Therapies derived from tissue engineering probably eliminate the need for conventional surgery. Bacterial cellulose is presented as an alternative that is safe, biocompatible, and has low toxicity. To investigate the effect on healing of direct application of a bacterial cellulose graft on the tympanic membrane compared to the conventional approach with autologous fascia. Randomized controlled trial. Forty patients with tympanic membrane perforations secondary to chronic otitis media were included, and were randomly assigned to an experimental group (20), treated with a bacterial cellulose graft (BC) and control group (20), treated with autologous temporal fascia (fascia). We evaluated the surgical time, hospital stay, time of epithelialization and the rate of tympanic perforation closure. Hospital costs were compared. The statistical significance level accepted was established at p<0.05. The closure of perforations was similar in both groups. The average operation time in the fascia group was 76.50min versus 14.06min bacterial cellulose in the group (p=0.0001). The hospital cost by the Brazilian public health system was R$ 600.00 for the bacterial cellulose group, and R$ 7778.00 for the fascia group (p=0.0001). Bacterial cellulose grafts promoted the closure of the tympanic membrane perforations, and were demonstrated to be innovative, effective, safe, minimally invasive, efficacious and to have a very low cost.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 114 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 17%
Student > Bachelor 20 17%
Researcher 10 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 5%
Student > Postgraduate 5 4%
Other 19 17%
Unknown 35 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 17%
Engineering 8 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 6%
Chemistry 7 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Other 28 24%
Unknown 40 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2015.
All research outputs
#22,759,452
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology
#574
of 726 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#239,949
of 279,886 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology
#120
of 140 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 726 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,886 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 140 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.